labor laws cases Can Be Fun For Anyone
labor laws cases Can Be Fun For Anyone
Blog Article
The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It's also a properly-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is a delay of someday from the registration of FIR which has not been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness with the alleged incidence and the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession in the petitioners has become tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place to generally be the real brothers on the deceased but they didn't react in any way for the confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, a single after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation regarding why her arrest wasn't effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on countless situations that extra judicial confession of the accused is usually a weak type of evidence which could be manoeuvred via the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution can also be relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning existence of some light on the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners collectively with a motorcycle at 4.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed during the bank and considering the fact that only the appellants were posted with the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
It is now perfectly-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are totally different, therefore, inside our view the figured out Judge experienced fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner with the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
The recent amendment to Section 489-File with the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the legislation with contemporary challenges.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of the grid project and submitted that adequate mitigation measures were in place to render any opportunity adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted being built.
In almost any society, the enforcement of legislation and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. One of several most major crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 in the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is very important to make certain justice prevails.
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it requires legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
I) The above referred case FIR, for that murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered around the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid that is father of the petitioner and as per Tale of FIR, the petitioner is an eyewkness on the prevalence.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden supplied to any reported judgment might depend upon the reputation of both the reporter plus the judges.[seven]
PACER allows any person with an account to search and locate appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register for just a PACER account.
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve read more it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only completed If your employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were very well aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to generally be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to observe that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are completely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case legislation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--